High-performance AI without the risks.
Press
“In five years, we will look back and it will seem incredible how reckless we were,” predicts Gemma Galdón Clavell.”
“Gemma is changing the way technology is created through her innovative algorithms audit methodology which ensures technology does not replicate the biases and injustices present in real-life decision-making tools.”
“Gemma Galdon is a leading voice on tech ethics and algorithmic accountability.”
Want to connect with our CEO & Founder?
Due to the high volume of requests for speaking engagements, interviews, and quotes from Eticas Founder & CEO Gemma Galdon Clavell, we kindly ask you to submit your request through the provided form. We’ll reach out to you promptly.
ETICAS IN THE NEWS
JULY 24, 2024
AI Auditing and AI Safety w/ CEO Gemma Galdon Clavell
Gemma shares Eticas.ai’s future vision, challenges, and product roadmap. The conversation includes insights on building and scaling an AI startup, comparing the startup ecosystem in New York and Spain, and advice on assembling a technical team.
JULY 9, 2024
Bad choices around safety kill AI’s potential
No one in the pharmaceutical industry would dare say that going through clinical trials harms their innovation. Somehow, the tech gurus developing new generative artificial intelligence (Gen AI) models do, Gemma Galdón-Clavell tells Cybernews in an interview.
MAY 30, 2024
The First Steps of the First AI Law: What Happens Now?
Gemma Galdón-Clavell explained that what is driving this new legislation is that there’s enough evidence that facial recognition — like remote biometrics and emotion recognition — doesn’t work nearly as well as it should.
Balancing Innovation and Risk: AI’s Impact on the CPA Profession
Davin Gnanapragasam, Dominique Shelton Leipzig, and Gemma Galdón-Clavell discuss the intersection of AI and accounting from multiple angles – focusing in our the impact of AI on our work, the importance of data privacy, and the impact of biases and transparency.
ETICAS IN THE NEWS
Gemma Galdon’s skepticism regarding future technological regulations, which may fall into the same errors as the GDPR: “4 years later we are still in immobility”
